Untitled Design (29)
Dose Response

Previous Teleseminars

Previous DRSG Seminars – 2017-2023


Genetic Toxicology and Dose Response Data.

George Johnson, Ph.D., Swansea University

13 June, 2023


Assessing effects of mixtures of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) using transcriptomic points of departure.

Gregory Addicks, Ph.D., Health Canada

7 March, 2023


Addressing Inter-individual Variabilities in Human Exposure and Toxicological Susceptibility in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessments.

Dingsheng Li, Ph.D., University of Nevada, Reno

1 November, 2022


Accelerating QA review of PBPK models: A template approach to model implementation.

Amanda Bernstein, Ph.D., U.S. EPA

13 September, 2022


Bayesian model averaging for BMD estimation: Extension of model sets and distributions.

José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Ph.D., EFSA.

7 June, 2022


Advancing the use of transcriptomic points of departure for regulatory decision-making.

Carole Yauk, Ph.D., University of Ottawa

1 March, 2022


A new method for characterizing inter-species toxicodynamic variability
Sarah D. Burnett, Ph.D., Texas A&M University
2 November 2021


Individual, independent, and combined effects of toxic metals and manganese on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Michael Borghese, Ph.D., Health Canada


Chemical toxicity assessment using high-throughput transcriptomics and next generation sequencing: A case study of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
Anthony J.F. Reardon, Health Canada
2 March 2021

Concentration-response Analysis of Image-based High-throughput Phenotypic Profiling Data for Chemical Bioactivity Screening
Johanna Nyffeler, U.S. EPA
4 August 2020 | Video Presentation


High-throughput Transcriptomic Profiling of Chemicals for Risk Assessment Applications
Richard Judson, U.S. EPA
5 May 2020 | Video Presentation


Recent Probabilistic and Computational Advances in Dose-Response Assessment to Better Support Chemical Risk Assessment
Weihsueh Chiu, Texas A&M University
4 February 2020


Cox Proportional Hazard Regression and Splines: A Cautionary Tale for Exposure-Response Assessment
Dustin Long, University of Alabama Birmingham
5 March 2019


Differences Between Scientific, Legal, and Public Policy Uses of Probability
Nathan Schachtman, Esq., (SRA Risk Policy and Law Specialty Group)
7 August 2018


The NTP Proposed Approach to Genomic Dose-Response Modeling
Scott Auerbach, National Toxicology Program (NTP)
7 August 2018


New Data for Dose Response, Specifically Using Toxcast Data
Richard Judson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
3 April 2018


Machine Learning in Dose-Response Assessment: Translating Science to Decisions (Abstract)
Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 March 2018


Considerations for the Dose‐Response Analyses of Inorganic Arsenic Health Outcomes
Jeff Gift, U.S. EPA
3 October 2017


Understanding the Biochemical Origin of Sigmoidal Dose Responses: Ultrasensitive Response Motifs
Qiang Zhang, Emory University
5 September 2017


Using 21st Century Science for Risk-related evaluations: An Overview of the NAS Risk21 Report
Jonathan Samet, George Daston, & Lauren Zeise, On behalf of the National Academies Risk21 Committee
1 August 2017


Exposure‐Response in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, from Receptors to Ecological Landscapes
Wayne G. Landis, Western Washington University
2 May 2017


Health and Economic Consequences of Endocrine Disruptors in the US and EU
Leo Transande, New York University
4 April 2017


Facilitated Discussion: Mentoring in Risk Assessment
2 February 2017